Once the post office receives an item for delivery to a specific person at a given address, it dedicates itself to achieve that end. It persists in delivering the letter to alternate places until the intended recipient receives it.
In postal history terms, this is called redirection. In the United States, it also is known as forwarding.
The cover shown in Figure 1 was forwarded three times in September 1906, giving testimony to the post office’s dedication to the adage, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”
Several characteristics identify redirected mail.
The most obvious is that the original address is crossed out and a new location is suggested.
The 1929 cover shown in Figure 2 has the original London address crossed out with blue crayon and a new location in Oxford written in red ink.
Sometimes, as with this example, the new address is written in a different color ink to distinguish it from the original address.
Instructional markings, often in manuscript, are another characteristic of forwarded mail.
Figure 3 shows a folded letter mailed in 1852 to the wrong town in Scotland. The manuscript notation in red ink on the cover reads “Not for Auchterarder. Try Auchtermuchty.” The two towns are both in Scotland but are about 25 miles apart.
Common instructional markings including “Not known,” “Not here,” “Not for … ” and “Kindly forward” indicate a letter has arrived in a location but cannot be delivered to the addressee there.
At times, the post office in the United Kingdom required an additional charge to try again to deliver a letter to a new and different address.
At other times, the service of redirection was provided with no additional charge.
With the start of Uniform Penny Postage Jan. 10, 1840, postage throughout the United Kingdom became 1 penny if paid at the time of mailing, and, at that time, the post office usually charged another penny to forward mail.
Figure 4 shows an example of an additional charge for redirection.
The letter was originally mailed June 28, 1849, in Brighton to be delivered to an addressee, “E Guillaume,” also in Brighton. A 1d imperforate stamp (Scott 3) paid the original postage.
The letter could not be delivered because “E Guillaume” had apparently gone to London. The original destination, “Brighton,” was struck through, and “Try London” was written on the letter. An additional 1d, indicated by the vertical pen stroke in black ink, was payable when, and if, the addressee was found in London, and the letter was successfully delivered.
The post office abolished the charge for redirection of letters in 1892 and for postcards, newspapers, book post and samples in 1895.
The envelope shown in Figure 2 was forwarded in 1929, 34 years after the abolition of redirection charges, and bears no indication of additional postage. Forwarding had become compliments of the post office.
Postal charges for redirection were applied inconsistently by the post office prior to abolishing additional fees for forwarding.
For example, the folded letter shown in Figure 3 was mailed and redirected before 1892 but was not charged the additional penny for redirection. Sometimes, the extra penny was collected, and sometimes it was not.
There is, of course, one circumstance for which redirection is not possible. The cover shown in Figure 5 gives the reason: “Dead.”
Crossed out addresses, certain instructional markings and indications of additional postage charges often indicate redirected mail.
blogThis month marks my fifth anniversary writing the monthly auction report for Linn’s Stamp News. That’s 60 columns, totaling more than 100,000 words (enough for a decent-sized novel), all about our favorite hobby. Read More ›
blogIn mid-September I traveled to London, England, to attend Autumn Stampex, one of two British national stamp shows sponsored by the Philatelic Traders’ Society, Great Britain’s national stamp dealers association. The show took place Sept. 16-19 at the Business Design Centre in Islington (central north London), a comfortable and attractive venue for a stamp show. Read More ›
September 28, 2015 03:30 AMAfter the 1906 earthquake in San Francisco, postal workers not only saved the mail, they saved the new post office building. Read More ›
blogWe stamp collectors are an observant bunch. After all, we spend a great deal of time closely scrutinizing small, colorful bits of paper. Read More ›
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News associate editor Michael Baadke talks about a record fifth win for wildlife artist Joseph Hautman in the federal duck stamp art contest, and see the painting that will appear on next year’s federal duck stamp
Watch as Scott catalog senior editor Marty Frankevicz questions Bolivia’s choice for the design of a 2013 stamp honoring the country’s efforts to protect its migrants in foreign lands.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News managing editor Chad Snee discusses the discovery of the upright Jenny Invert pane received in an order from Stamp Fulfillment Services in Kansas City, Mo., and also reports on the Confederate Stamp Alliance.
Watch as Linn’s senior editor Denise McCarty discusses the situation with Canada’s recalled Hoodoo stamp, as well as stamps from the United States and other countries that also depict these rock formations.
It is always a treat to get to see stamp dealers’ own collections.
In the recently concluded Linn’s United States Stamp Popularity Poll, the Circus Posters set of eight stamps was chosen as the overall favorite issue of 2014.
Dispersal of the splendid Daniel B. Curtis collection continued March 25, with Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries gaveling items from United States back-of-the-book and possessions.
The 175th anniversary of the first postage stamp, Great Britain's Penny Black, is May 6, but the stamp was placed on sale May 1, 1840, for mailers to use beginning on May 6, the designated issue date.