Once the post office receives an item for delivery to a specific person at a given address, it dedicates itself to achieve that end. It persists in delivering the letter to alternate places until the intended recipient receives it.
In postal history terms, this is called redirection. In the United States, it also is known as forwarding.
The cover shown in Figure 1 was forwarded three times in September 1906, giving testimony to the post office’s dedication to the adage, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”
Several characteristics identify redirected mail.
The most obvious is that the original address is crossed out and a new location is suggested.
The 1929 cover shown in Figure 2 has the original London address crossed out with blue crayon and a new location in Oxford written in red ink.
Sometimes, as with this example, the new address is written in a different color ink to distinguish it from the original address.
Instructional markings, often in manuscript, are another characteristic of forwarded mail.
Figure 3 shows a folded letter mailed in 1852 to the wrong town in Scotland. The manuscript notation in red ink on the cover reads “Not for Auchterarder. Try Auchtermuchty.” The two towns are both in Scotland but are about 25 miles apart.
Common instructional markings including “Not known,” “Not here,” “Not for … ” and “Kindly forward” indicate a letter has arrived in a location but cannot be delivered to the addressee there.
At times, the post office in the United Kingdom required an additional charge to try again to deliver a letter to a new and different address.
At other times, the service of redirection was provided with no additional charge.
With the start of Uniform Penny Postage Jan. 10, 1840, postage throughout the United Kingdom became 1 penny if paid at the time of mailing, and, at that time, the post office usually charged another penny to forward mail.
Figure 4 shows an example of an additional charge for redirection.
The letter was originally mailed June 28, 1849, in Brighton to be delivered to an addressee, “E Guillaume,” also in Brighton. A 1d imperforate stamp (Scott 3) paid the original postage.
The letter could not be delivered because “E Guillaume” had apparently gone to London. The original destination, “Brighton,” was struck through, and “Try London” was written on the letter. An additional 1d, indicated by the vertical pen stroke in black ink, was payable when, and if, the addressee was found in London, and the letter was successfully delivered.
The post office abolished the charge for redirection of letters in 1892 and for postcards, newspapers, book post and samples in 1895.
The envelope shown in Figure 2 was forwarded in 1929, 34 years after the abolition of redirection charges, and bears no indication of additional postage. Forwarding had become compliments of the post office.
Postal charges for redirection were applied inconsistently by the post office prior to abolishing additional fees for forwarding.
For example, the folded letter shown in Figure 3 was mailed and redirected before 1892 but was not charged the additional penny for redirection. Sometimes, the extra penny was collected, and sometimes it was not.
There is, of course, one circumstance for which redirection is not possible. The cover shown in Figure 5 gives the reason: “Dead.”
Crossed out addresses, certain instructional markings and indications of additional postage charges often indicate redirected mail.
blogEleanor Roosevelt said, “Great minds share ideas …,” and Linn’s is fortunate to have thoughtful leaders of the stamp hobby on its Editorial Advisory Board. Board members participated in a lively discussion of “The State of the Stamp Hobby” Aug. 21 at the American Philatelic Society Stampshow in Grand Rapids, Mich. Read More ›
August 19, 2015 01:58 PMIn an unusual development for our hobby, the Office of Inspector General of the United States Postal Service is blogging about stamp collecting. Read More ›
August 17, 2015 12:19 AMFrom 1967 to 2006, Royal Mail (Great Britain’s post office) advertised all new issues with posters displayed in post offices. Most of these posters had pictures of the stamps along with basic information such as the date of issue, instructions for first-day covers, etc. Some were a little more elaborate. Read More ›
August 14, 2015 09:46 AMWill the United States Postal Service issue a Christmas stamp this year to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the classic television musical special A Charlie Brown Christmas? Read More ›
Watch as Linn’s associate editor Michael Baadke discusses happenings at the recent APS Stampshow from the show floor.
Watch as Linn's/Scott editorial director Donna Houseman discusses the early release of the new U.S. Elvis stamp, the possibility of a Peanuts stamp and Linn's at the upcoming APS Stampshow.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News managing editor Chad Snee discusses highlights of Robert A. Siegel Auction Rarities Week sales in late June, and reports that the 49¢ price for a first-class United States stamp will remain in effect until April.
Watch as Linn’s senior editor Denise McCarty discusses the hiring of a new executive director of the American Philatelic Society, the new Linn’s Editorial Advisory Board and the upcoming APS Stampshow.
It is always a treat to get to see stamp dealers’ own collections.
In the recently concluded Linn’s United States Stamp Popularity Poll, the Circus Posters set of eight stamps was chosen as the overall favorite issue of 2014.
Dispersal of the splendid Daniel B. Curtis collection continued March 25, with Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries gaveling items from United States back-of-the-book and possessions.
The 175th anniversary of the first postage stamp, Great Britain's Penny Black, is May 6, but the stamp was placed on sale May 1, 1840, for mailers to use beginning on May 6, the designated issue date.