Once the post office receives an item for delivery to a specific person at a given address, it dedicates itself to achieve that end. It persists in delivering the letter to alternate places until the intended recipient receives it.
In postal history terms, this is called redirection. In the United States, it also is known as forwarding.
The cover shown in Figure 1 was forwarded three times in September 1906, giving testimony to the post office’s dedication to the adage, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”
Several characteristics identify redirected mail.
The most obvious is that the original address is crossed out and a new location is suggested.
The 1929 cover shown in Figure 2 has the original London address crossed out with blue crayon and a new location in Oxford written in red ink.
Sometimes, as with this example, the new address is written in a different color ink to distinguish it from the original address.
Instructional markings, often in manuscript, are another characteristic of forwarded mail.
Figure 3 shows a folded letter mailed in 1852 to the wrong town in Scotland. The manuscript notation in red ink on the cover reads “Not for Auchterarder. Try Auchtermuchty.” The two towns are both in Scotland but are about 25 miles apart.
Common instructional markings including “Not known,” “Not here,” “Not for … ” and “Kindly forward” indicate a letter has arrived in a location but cannot be delivered to the addressee there.
At times, the post office in the United Kingdom required an additional charge to try again to deliver a letter to a new and different address.
At other times, the service of redirection was provided with no additional charge.
With the start of Uniform Penny Postage Jan. 10, 1840, postage throughout the United Kingdom became 1 penny if paid at the time of mailing, and, at that time, the post office usually charged another penny to forward mail.
Figure 4 shows an example of an additional charge for redirection.
The letter was originally mailed June 28, 1849, in Brighton to be delivered to an addressee, “E Guillaume,” also in Brighton. A 1d imperforate stamp (Scott 3) paid the original postage.
The letter could not be delivered because “E Guillaume” had apparently gone to London. The original destination, “Brighton,” was struck through, and “Try London” was written on the letter. An additional 1d, indicated by the vertical pen stroke in black ink, was payable when, and if, the addressee was found in London, and the letter was successfully delivered.
The post office abolished the charge for redirection of letters in 1892 and for postcards, newspapers, book post and samples in 1895.
The envelope shown in Figure 2 was forwarded in 1929, 34 years after the abolition of redirection charges, and bears no indication of additional postage. Forwarding had become compliments of the post office.
Postal charges for redirection were applied inconsistently by the post office prior to abolishing additional fees for forwarding.
For example, the folded letter shown in Figure 3 was mailed and redirected before 1892 but was not charged the additional penny for redirection. Sometimes, the extra penny was collected, and sometimes it was not.
There is, of course, one circumstance for which redirection is not possible. The cover shown in Figure 5 gives the reason: “Dead.”
Crossed out addresses, certain instructional markings and indications of additional postage charges often indicate redirected mail.
blogIn this column in the Aug. 24 issue of Linn’s, I referred to the American Philatelic Research Library in Bellefonte, Pa., as a “gift to stamp collectors.” The BNAPS library and the APRL are two of many libraries available to stamp collectors, and some philatelic libraries are available online. Read More ›
blogIt’s often been said that one of the salutary benefits of collecting stamps is the friendships made along one’s philatelic journey. If I were asked to place a value on the bonds thus forged with collectors in locales near and far, I would be rich beyond measure. A few of these hobby friends I have never met in person. Read More ›
blogToday, Nov. 11, 2015, is Veterans Day. Over the years, a number of United States stamps honoring those who have served in our nation’s armed forces have been issued. Read More ›
blogMy previous blog post focused on a mystery: the apparent indentations of paper clips on United States Purple Heart forever stamps that were used to mail payments to the circulation department of my employer, Amos Media in Sidney, Ohio. Read More ›
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News senior editor Denise McCarty discusses Great Britain’s final stamp issue for 2015, a Star Wars prestige booklet, and reveals what is included in its stamp program for 2016.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News managing editor Chad Snee discusses a registered 1967 cover from Qatar that recently sold for almost $1,200 and the latest discovery of an Upright Jenny Invert pane.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News editorial director Donna Houseman announces that Linn’s has been named official daily publisher of World Stamp Show-NY 2016 and provides an update on the reorganization of the Scott catalogs.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News senior editor Marty Frankevicz reports on the suspension of Canada Post’s cluster box conversion plan after the election of a new prime minister.
It is always a treat to get to see stamp dealers’ own collections.
In the recently concluded Linn’s United States Stamp Popularity Poll, the Circus Posters set of eight stamps was chosen as the overall favorite issue of 2014.
Dispersal of the splendid Daniel B. Curtis collection continued March 25, with Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries gaveling items from United States back-of-the-book and possessions.
The 175th anniversary of the first postage stamp, Great Britain's Penny Black, is May 6, but the stamp was placed on sale May 1, 1840, for mailers to use beginning on May 6, the designated issue date.