By Rick Miller
One of the primary functions of a stamp catalog is to value stamps. That sounds pretty simple and straightforward, but it really isn't.
There are two basic systems for assigning catalog values: retail values and reference values.
Before embarking upon a transaction based on catalog value, you should make sure which kind of valuing system the catalog in question uses.
Stamp catalogs that use retail values, such as various Scott catalogs, are actually in the minority in the world of stamp collecting. For example, most European catalogs are based on a reference value system.
Scott catalog values are based on actual retail transactions and represent what you can reasonably expect to pay in the retail market for an undamaged stamp in a very fine grade. For example, the 2/6 Allegory of Charity semipostal stamp, New South Wales Scott B2, shown in Figure 1, has a Scott catalog value of $200 for unused, hinged and in the VF grade (centering).
Although the stamp sold for 2/6, it had a postage value of only 2½d.
What should you expect to pay for it if you buy it from a retail stamp dealer in this condition and grade? You should expect to pay $200.
If you own this stamp and you want to sell it to a dealer, how much could you expect him to pay you for it? That is an entirely different question. The answer depends on a number of different factors, including how badly the dealer needs it to replenish his stock and how quickly he thinks he will be able to resell it.
If you do not understand what the word "retail" means, you are liable to come to grief in your stamp transactions.
The dictionary definition of retail is "to sell in small quantities to the ultimate customer." You, the collector are the ultimate customer. The stamp dealer is the retailer.
Collectors buy from dealers at retail prices. Dealers, if they want to remain in business, will not buy from collectors at anywhere near retail prices.
Many collectors remember when the Scott catalogs made the transition in the late 1980s (in the 1989 and 1990 editions) from a reference value system to the retail value system, accompanied as it was by much weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth from some dealers and collectors.
For an example of the change from reference to retail catalog values, consider the £1 blue-green King Edward VII stamp, Great Britain Scott 142, shown in Figure 2.
An unused, hinged example with reasonable centering was still valued at $2,000 in the 1989 Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue. In the 1990 edition, it was at $1,000 for a stamp in a grade of fine-very fine. Today the Scott retail value for a VF example of this stamp is $1,200.
Note also that the catalog standard for grading went from "reasonable centering" for 1989 and earlier to F-VF in 1990. Beginning with the 1997 Scott catalog, values are for stamps in the grade of VF.
The change in catalog values from 1988-89 to 1990 was not the result of a decline in marketplace prices but the result of the change from reference values to retail catalog values.
Dealers' and collectors' objections to the change were mostly psychological.
Some dealers felt that going to a retail valuing system took away their ability to wheel and deal. For those addicted to dickering, the retail value system seemed just too straightforward. Some collectors had a hard time getting over the mental barrier of having to pay about full Scott catalog value for stamps after years, or even decades, of buying their stamps at a percentage of Scott values. After all, for much of their collecting lives, anyone who paid full catalog for a stamp was considered to be either desperate to acquire or a bit of a fool.
Today there can still be dickering using the retail value system, but now it focuses on condition and grade rather than on the catalog values themselves.
Today when you hear a collector boasting about acquiring a stamp from a dealer at a steep discount from Scott value, look closely at the stamp. The explanation for the discount can often be found in its condition and grade.
A handful of dealers continued to use the 1988 edition of the Scott catalog for valuing for quite a few years after it was published.
There are cheaper ways to acquire stamps than buying them one at a time at retail catalog value. For instance, you can acquire large numbers of stamps by buying accumulations, collections, kiloware or stamp packets. Of course, some of the stamps acquired in this way will be damaged, heavily canceled or poorly centered, and there may be quite a bit of duplication.
This still can be the most cost-effective way of acquiring low-catalog-value stamps, especially if you can trade the duplicates to other collectors.
But don't expect to turn around and sell these stamps to a dealer for retail catalog value, or anywhere near it.
The Scott minimum catalog value of 20¢ is designed to pay the dealer for his time and effort in identifying and stocking the stamp. Stamps valued at the minimum catalog value are not, in and of themselves, really worth 20¢.
For higher-catalog-value stamps, the best way to acquire them is usually one at a time, paying very close attention to the individual stamp's grade and condition.
It should remain uppermost in your mind that Scott catalog values are for undamaged stamps in VF condition. Stamps in lower grades sell at a discount from Scott catalog values, if they sell at all.
Classic stamps in extremely fine condition can sell for more than Scott catalog value, sometimes considerably more.
Buying at auction is also a different proposition from buying stamps at retail, one at a time from a dealer.
Depending on the material and how it is presented by the auctioneer, you may pay considerable less than catalog value for an auction lot, or you might have to pay considerably more.
In a catalog that uses a reference value system, both the prospective buyer and the prospective seller understand that the catalog value is not a retail value. It is an abstract value assigned to show the relative value of stamps in relation to each other.
For example, a stamp with a reference value of €5 is five times as valuable as a stamp with a reference value of €1.
Reference catalog values are always higher than retail values, sometimes by as much as 100 percent. Dealers using reference-value catalogs understand that, and they discount the prices at which they sell the stamps by standard percentages.
A VF, undamaged stamp with a reference catalog value of €5 from a catalog with a discount rate of 50 percent, would normally sell at retail for about €2.50.
The standard discount varies from catalog publisher to catalog publisher.
If you are looking to acquire stamps valued by a catalog that uses reference values, you must first find out what the standard discount for that catalog is. If you paid full catalog value from a reference value catalog, you probably paid too much.
For example, the 200-piaster green and black Sultan Mohammed V stamp, Turkey Scott 270, shown in Figure 3, has a Scott catalog value of $550 in unused, hinged condition and in a VF grade.
The same stamp is listed in the 2003-04 German-language Michel Europe Catalog, Vol. 4, South Europe, as No. 245 and is valued in the same condition and grade at €1,000.
The exchange rate for the euro stood at $1 to €1.112 in September 2003, when the Michel catalog was published, so the Michel catalog value for the stamp equates to $1,112.
Although catalog values in foreign currencies will always be affected by exchange-rate fluctuations, as you can see from this comparison, the Michel catalogs use reference values, not retail values.
The lack of a direct connection between reference catalog values and the retail marketplace was starkly illustrated by the remarks of Albertino de Figueiredo, president of the Afinsa Group, in the No. 84 (2003) issue of Flash, the journal of the International Federation of Philately (FIP).
The Spanish-based Afinsa Group publishes the Domfil line of catalogs and owns major stakes in various high-profile auction firms and in new-issue selling.
The cover of a Domfil Europa CEPT Thematic Stamp Catalogue is shown in Figure 4.
In his editorial, De Figueiredo said that one of a catalog publisher's key responsibilities is to "resist temptation" and "abstain from lowering prices."
De Figueiredo said: "The reduction of stamp prices has a devastating affect – it removes value from both dealers' stocks and from collectors' holdings. We must not forget that a stamp collector is also an investor . . . stamps have interesting financial returns and they can be used to solve financial problems without having to turn to bank loans or mortgages. On the contrary, we should ensure that prices rise."
Further, de Figueiredo states that such a policy "creates loyalty among collectors and remunerates dealers appropriately."
One of the facts of life of the retail marketplace is that prices sometimes go up and they sometimes go down.
This philosophy of setting catalog values differs markedly from that of the Scott catalog editors, whose primary goal is to reflect the reality of the marketplace.
If a catalog publisher is dedicated to the proposition that his catalog values will never go down, then they obviously are not a reflection of the retail market.
I don't mean to imply that catalog publishers who use the reference value system are being underhanded. I do mean to say that it is a different system, and collectors should understand the system before they attempt to use it.
If you are buying stamps from a dealer who bases his prices on a reference-value catalog, it is always a good idea to check his prices against Scott to see where they stand.
Many country catalogs list and value stamps that are not listed and valued by Scott. In those cases, direct comparisons are not possible. But you can average the differences from several other items that are listed by both catalogs to get a good idea of the discount percentage that applies to the catalog, and use that percentage to check the prices for items not listed by Scott.
Okay, collectors, come on down for a philatelic installment of The Price Is Right.
The VF, unused Korean 1-won Yin Yang stamp, Scott 32, shown in Figure 5, has a Scott catalog value of $750 and a Michel catalog value of €1,110.
How much would you expect to pay for it in a retail transaction with a stamp dealer?
July 30, 2015 08:04 PMIn the Editor’s Insights columns in the July 20 Linn’s Stamp News monthly and the Aug. 10 weekly Linn’s, I mentioned Linn’s Editorial Advisory Board without giving too much detail. Linn’s goal is to engage its audience both in print and online and to grow this audience. The role of the newly formed Linn’s Editorial Advisory Board is to assist us achieving these goals by keeping us focused on the needs of our audience and helping us adapt to today’s market. Read More ›
July 30, 2015 09:01 AMAs in previous years, Rarities Week, the series of sales conducted June 22-26 by Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries in New York, included several name sales as well as an assortment of notable items from around the world. The week kicked off with something of a do-over: a sizable assortment of better United States stamps and covers that had appeared in four previous sales, but whose winning bidder then failed to pay for them. Read More ›
July 23, 2015 04:35 PMThe Tieton, Wash., post office is a simple 1935 cement block building with a slat wood facade. Townsfolk in the agricultural community of 1,200 in central Washington believe the post office could become a landmark, if only the United States Postal Service would allow them to cover the front with a stamp-like mosaic. Read More ›
July 23, 2015 03:11 PMThe American Philatelic Society will host the nation’s largest annual stamp exhibition Aug. 20-23. The show will take place at the DeVos Place Convention Center, 303 Monroe Ave. NW, Grand Rapids, Mich. Read More ›
Watch as Scott catalog senior editor Marty Frankevicz discusses the largest souvenir card produced by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. The card is one of three issued to honor the centenary of San Francisco’s Panama-Pacific International Exposition.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News associate editor Michael Baadke discusses Canada’s recently recalled $1.20 Dinosaur Provincial Park stamps featuring inaccurately described Hoodoo rock formations.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News editorial director Donna Houseman discusses the discovery of another pane of the intentionally created upright variety of the $2 Jenny Invert stamp.
Chad Snee discusses the recent sale of the glass locket containing the famed 1918 Jenny Invert airmail error stamp.
It is always a treat to get to see stamp dealers’ own collections.
In the recently concluded Linn’s United States Stamp Popularity Poll, the Circus Posters set of eight stamps was chosen as the overall favorite issue of 2014.
Dispersal of the splendid Daniel B. Curtis collection continued March 25, with Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries gaveling items from United States back-of-the-book and possessions.
The 175th anniversary of the first postage stamp, Great Britain's Penny Black, is May 6, but the stamp was placed on sale May 1, 1840, for mailers to use beginning on May 6, the designated issue date.