By Janet Klug
Unless you collect only new issues acquired directly from the issuing postal administration, the stamps in your collection are previously owned. Depending on how old the stamps are, there might have been a dozen or more owners before you.
We are merely temporary curators of the stamps in our collection. If we take good care of them, another generation of collectors will be able to collect and enjoy them at a later date.
Caring for the stamps you have collected is not difficult.
Common-sense practices, such as careful storage in albums or stock books, are the first lines of defense in making certain stamps will not become damaged.
Storing albums upright, as well as keeping them out of direct sunlight and away from humidity and broad temperature swings, will help assure the stamps stay in good condition.
Avoid picking up bad habits. One of the most annoying and pervasive habits is writing on the backs of stamps.
If the stamps in my own collection are representative of the stamps in circulation, the habit of pencilling the catalog number and sometimes even the catalog value on the back of a stamp is widespread. Don't do it!
Writing on the back of a stamp makes no sense. Dozens of different stamp catalogs are published all over the world. Which catalog was used to determine the catalog number?
Also, catalog numbers have been known to change over time, and catalog values change frequently. The collector who wrote the catalog number on the back of the stamp may not have correctly identified the stamp, and the number could be wrong.
Figure 1 shows a stamp from Tonga that was incorrectly identified on the reverse as Scott 39, a ½-penny green Coat of Arms stamp with the turtles watermark. The stamp is actually Scott 73 with a multiple crown and script CA watermark.
Pencil marks on the reverse of a stamp create additional problems. If it is a used stamp, a light pencil mark might be removable using a soft eraser, but there is a great risk of creating a thin in the paper from rubbing the eraser back and forth in one place.
Attempting to erase writing on the back of a stamp can lead to bent corners and tears. Troublesome though they may be, leaving the pencil marks alone is probably the best way to keep the stamp in reasonably good condition.
If light pencil marks are annoying, imagine what a ballpoint pen can do to a stamp. Many years ago, I purchased a stamp lot sight unseen from a mail-order dealer. Every stamp in the lot had a catalog number written with ballpoint pen, and, to make it even worse, the collector who wrote the numbers used so much pressure that the numbers were embossed into the stamp.
I returned the lot for a refund, but recreated the effect on the stamp illustrated in Figure 2, the Australia Queen Elizabeth 4-penny stamp (Scott 294) issued in 1957. The image should show the embossing from the pen pressure at top right on the front of the stamp.
Collectors of mint stamps would not want writing on the back of that otherwise fresh gum, and yet it is surprising at how often you see an otherwise mint never-hinged stamp with writing on top of the gum. The pencil marks are nearly impossible to remove, and the attempt to do so will leave a mint stamp with disturbed gum.
Even worse than a catalog number is a lengthy description written on the reverse of a stamp. The amount of writing on the Swedish stamp shown in Figure 3 is almost comical. A prior owner must have spent a lot of time working on the varieties and did not want to get them confused. The information that was written on the stamp might have been better placed on the album page in the space where the stamp was mounted.
I occasionally receive letters and e-mails from collectors voicing dissatisfaction with dealers who write values using pencil on the front of covers they sell. If this annoys you, it is best to discuss it directly with the dealer.
Encourage the dealer to use glassines or Mylar sleeves and to put the price on the outer covering.
Once you have acquired a nice cover I implore you to avoid writing anything on it. This may sound like elementary advice, but there are collectors who seem to enjoy pointing out significant points on a cover and recording them for posterity.
Figure 4 shows an example of an otherwise very nice 1946 registered official cover from Ceylon.
A former owner felt the need to draw attention to the town name that had a different spelling in the postmark than on the registration label.
Arrows, circles and underlines emphasize the added text: "Note the spelling with the postal mark." An otherwise desirable cover with an uncommon "M.O. & S.B." (money order & savings bank) postmark was instantly and permanently made less desirable with the addition of a few pen strokes.
One of the easiest and best things you can do to help the hobby prosper well into the future is to take personal responsibility for the care of your collection.
Realize that your collection will someday become another person's pride and joy. Take proper care of it for your own enjoyment now and for the collectors in the future.
blogEleanor Roosevelt said, “Great minds share ideas …,” and Linn’s is fortunate to have thoughtful leaders of the stamp hobby on its Editorial Advisory Board. Board members participated in a lively discussion of “The State of the Stamp Hobby” Aug. 21 at the American Philatelic Society Stampshow in Grand Rapids, Mich. Read More ›
August 19, 2015 01:58 PMIn an unusual development for our hobby, the Office of Inspector General of the United States Postal Service is blogging about stamp collecting. Read More ›
August 17, 2015 12:19 AMFrom 1967 to 2006, Royal Mail (Great Britain’s post office) advertised all new issues with posters displayed in post offices. Most of these posters had pictures of the stamps along with basic information such as the date of issue, instructions for first-day covers, etc. Some were a little more elaborate. Read More ›
August 14, 2015 09:46 AMWill the United States Postal Service issue a Christmas stamp this year to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the classic television musical special A Charlie Brown Christmas? Read More ›
Watch as Linn’s associate editor Michael Baadke discusses happenings at the recent APS Stampshow from the show floor.
Watch as Linn's/Scott editorial director Donna Houseman discusses the early release of the new U.S. Elvis stamp, the possibility of a Peanuts stamp and Linn's at the upcoming APS Stampshow.
Watch as Linn’s Stamp News managing editor Chad Snee discusses highlights of Robert A. Siegel Auction Rarities Week sales in late June, and reports that the 49¢ price for a first-class United States stamp will remain in effect until April.
Watch as Linn’s senior editor Denise McCarty discusses the hiring of a new executive director of the American Philatelic Society, the new Linn’s Editorial Advisory Board and the upcoming APS Stampshow.
It is always a treat to get to see stamp dealers’ own collections.
In the recently concluded Linn’s United States Stamp Popularity Poll, the Circus Posters set of eight stamps was chosen as the overall favorite issue of 2014.
Dispersal of the splendid Daniel B. Curtis collection continued March 25, with Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries gaveling items from United States back-of-the-book and possessions.
The 175th anniversary of the first postage stamp, Great Britain's Penny Black, is May 6, but the stamp was placed on sale May 1, 1840, for mailers to use beginning on May 6, the designated issue date.