By Ronald Blanks
Sometimes colors can fade on stamps to the point that they look like color-omitted errors.
An online auction of an apparent color-omitted error illustrates this important point.
A buyer’s winning bid approached $100 for a faded stamp offered as a “color omitted error” on the online auction site eBay in September 2014.
Bidders placed 26 bids to reach a selling price of $99.89 on Sept. 26.
The so-called error is a mint single of the $5 stamp in the Americana series, issued in 1979 (Scott 1612).
The heading for the listing proclaimed, “US stamp: #1612 $5 TAN COLOR OMITTED ERROR Americana Issue MNG/OG stamp RARE.” The brief description was almost word-for-word identical to the heading.
Illustrated nearby is a picture I created based on the main eBay image used in the item’s listing that buyers saw. The simulation is based on a similarly faded item’s image that the Philatelic Foundation posted for public education.
The $5 Americana stamp on the left exhibits a grayish background. A normal example, with a tan background, is shown on the right. A second image of the gum side of the stamps (not shown here) also was available on the eBay auction.
Various agents, such as chemicals or sunlight, can easily alter colors. Furthermore, most collectors are hard-pressed to recognize genuine color-omitted errors. This is why collectors are often cautioned to obtain an opinion from a recognized expertizing authority.
In this case, a collector with a genuine interest in the stamp issue and an example in hand can see the contradiction between the auction heading and the image of the faded stamp.
As shown on both stamps, an uninked ring encircles the lantern’s reddish flame (a design trait shared by the series’ 50¢, $1 and $2 stamps as well).
By examining the flame part of the design, it is evident that the tan ink seen in the stamp on the right was not omitted in the stamp at left. The tan has faded to a grayish color.
If the tan ink had truly been omitted, the background would be just as white as the uninked ring around the flame.
Ironically, during the seven-day eBay auction an online resource was available to any prospective buyer of a possible Scott 1612 color-omitted error.
As a public service to the hobby, the Philatelic Foundation offers a searchable archive of its issued expertization certificates. The pictured $5 Americana first-day cover and the accompanying PF certificate (not shown) were available for viewing on the Foundation’s website.
The submitter asked if the plate block on the FDC was a tan color-omitted error, and the opinion answered in the negative for the same reason I describe above.
In short, both the single and the plate block are color changelings, not color-omitted errors.
The eBay seller of the faded $5 Americana single replied nonchalantly when I questioned several times its nature as an error.
At one point, the seller told me: “Thanks for your mail; any problems I always give full refund with certificate fees. Thanks for your information.”
The seller had a “100% Positive feedback” status from 32,583 rated transactions as of Oct. 4, 2014, a week after the auction ended.
The seller also advertised an eBay store with “-stamp” in the name and a dozen stamp categories including “Errors, Freaks, Oddities.”
As noted in the Jan. 26 Collectors’ Forum in Linn’s, all kinds of agents can purposely or accidentally change a stamp’s inks.
Pictured is a sampling of three U.S. color changelings I’ve acquired: 50¢ Americana (Scott 1608), 29¢ Love (2813) and 33¢ Alfred Verville (C113).
Each changeling is paired to its right with a normal example of the given stamp.
Collectors should approach any stamp described as an error with caution when unaccompanied by an expertization certificate from a reputable source.
Ronald Blanks has collected stamps since 1968. He currently specializes in U.S. postal history of mechanized postal improvements.